The Reader

Well, theres a double reason: I also switched computers around the time I swithed out my iPod for the iPhone.

Since I couldn't put it all on the iPhone anyway, and, I was backing up everything to a portable hard drive anyway, I didn't bother loading everything back into iTunes, just the stuff I "can't live without".

There's a lot of music I miss, but the current 11GB+ is the stuff I ALWAYS want on the phone.

The rest of the space on my iPhone is Podasts, photos, and app stuff. (And I also only sync about 10% of my Podcasts due to lack of space.)

Also, the time it takes to rotate music, as in remove and reload even the 8GB you mention, is a PITA, and not something I want to be doing on a regular basis.

I want ALL my stuff on the iPhone ALL the time. Someday I will be able to do that - 64GB would be enough for me to be able do this. That is what I was hoping for.

Battery life is less important to me as I work out of a car, so I always have the ability to attach to a power source. I mean, I would also like a long battery life; but if it was the same battery life as my 3G, but 4 times the memory, I'd take the memory.

Chuck F.
NE PA

On Jun 7, 2010, at 17:31, Bill Boulware <bill.boulware@gmail.com> wrote:

Why would you have to remove it from iTunes? I have ~300GB of Music in
iTunes and select certain artists, playlists, and smart rotatiting to only
keep about 8GB of Music on my iPhone, another ~8GB of podcasts and have the
other 16GB for Apps, books, data, etc.

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:29, Charles <the_chuckmann@yahoo.com> wrote:

I guess I should have explained that a bit better...

I used to have an 80GB iPod. I had it over half full, around 44GB used,
when I got my 16GB iPhone.

Out of necessity, I removed a lot of my music from iTunes....

So, I don't have everything I want on my 16GB. That's what I meant by
"barely" getting by. Even with 32GB, I'd be leaving a lot of stuff off that
I want.

So, to answer your question about what I'd rather have, battery life vs
memory: I want BOTH. :-)

Chuck F.
NE PA

On Jun 7, 2010, at 16:19, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:

So far the main thing that I am not completely happy with - I was really
hoping they'd announce a 64 GB model...

I could get by on 32GB (I gave been getting by -barely- with 16GB until
now, after all). But I really could use 64GB.

If you are getting by with 16 GB now, it seems unlikely that you NEED 64
GB....

Given the choice, in very limited space, do you want the extra 32 GB of
storage, or a larger battery?

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

• New Members 82