CBI arrested Satyam’s Internal Auditor

Monday, November 23, 2009 9:28 PM By Livemail

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested the internal auditor of former Satyam Computer Services Limited V S Prabhakar Rao.Satyam Internal Auditor

Rao was under investigation for his role in assisting the Raju brothers in cooking up the balance sheets and forging bank statements. A CBI official said that though Rao's role was suspected since the beginning, they could not establish a link till now. "We have arrested him today. We have adequate proof to link him with the entire scam," the official said. Rao was also a key aide of Satyam founder B Ramalinga Raju and is learnt to be the brain behind suggesting how to fudge the account statements. Rao was produced before the Nampally court which remanded him to four days in CBI custody.

Meanwhile, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has announced its decision to issue separate notices to six auditors found "prime facie guilty of professional misconduct" in the Satyam Computer Services case.

These notices are being served on four auditors belonging to the statutory audit team of PriceWaterhouse, Bangalore — S Gopalakrishnan, Srinivas Talluri, Shiva Prasad and Ch Ravindranath. Besides that, notices are also being issued to V Srinivasu, chief finance officer of the company, and V S Prabhakar Gupta, head of the internal audit cell of the company.

Notices will also be issued to the New Delhi and Kolkata offices of PriceWaterhouse. These notices are being issued based on the report of Director (Discipline) of the ICAI into the role of external and internal auditors in the commission of the financial regularities in Satyam Computer Services Ltd.

{Ca+Cma+Cs Friends} ADDITION U/S 41 OF THE IT ACT, 1961

Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:41 AM By Livemail

 

DEAR FRIENDS,
 
THERE ARE CERTAIN CREDIT BALANCES IN THE NAME OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR LAST 3 YEARS AND ARE STILL OUTSTANDING FOR PAYMENT. DURING THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT AO HAS ASKED THE INFORMATION IN RESPECT OF ABOVE WHICH HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. NOW HE HAS ASKED TO SHOW CAUSE THAT WHY THESE AMOUNTS SHOULD NOT BE ADDED IN THE INCOME OF ASSESSEE U/S 41 OF THE IT ACT.
 
AS PER MY UNDERSTANDING THE PROPOSED ACTION OF AO IS NOT AS PER LAW SINCE THIS TYPE OF SITUATION IS NOT PRESCRIBED U/S 41 OF THE IT ACT.
 
MEMBERS ARE REQUESTED TO KINDLY CONFIRM THAT MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT. MEMBERS ARE ALSO REQUESTED TO KINDLY SHARE THEIR VIEWS ON THE ABOVE IF THEY ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE EXPRESSED BY ME TOGETHER WITH THE DECIDED CASE LAW, NOTIFICATION OR CIRCULAR WHICH SUPPORTS THEIR VIEW. 
 

With best regards,

CA brajesh AGARWAL
09818623388 (M)

 

 

 

__._,_.___
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               Please ask your friends to send a blank e-mail to:
                     CaCmaCsFriends-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
                              to join the group.
................................................................................
       <Ca+Cma+Cs Friends> needs active, energetic persons as co-moderators
................................................................................
- For more information: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CaCmaCsFriends
- To Post message     :  CaCmaCsFriends@yahoogroups.com
- For Digest option   :  CaCmaCsFriends-digest@yahoogroups.com
- To switch to Normal :  CaCmaCsFriends-normal@yahoogroups.com
- For No Mail         :  CaCmaCsFriends-nomail@yahoogroups.com
- For Basic Help      :  CaCmaCsFriends-help@yahoogroups.com
- To Subscribe        :  CaCmaCsFriends-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
- To Unsubscribe      :  CaCmaCsFriends-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Knowledge is free and for sharing. Share and increase your knowledge.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.

__,_._,___

RBI has asked to Furnish Suspicious Transaction Report within Seven Days

Friday, November 20, 2009 6:18 PM By Livemail

A notification from the central bank, The Reserve Bank of India, has asked all banks and financial institutions to furnish a suspicious transaction report to the Financial Intelligence Unit-India within seven days of such a transaction.

The RBI norms on suspicious transactions come in the wake of Union Bank of India being pulled up by tax and finance ministry authorities in connection with large cash transactions of nearly suspicious-BRs 1,000 crore at its branches by Balaji Bullion. The Balaji Group's Balaji Bullion and Balaji Universal Trade have been named as front organisations used by former Jharkhand chief minister Madhu Koda and his aides to deposit money allegedly made from scams.

"The report must be furnished within seven days of arriving at a conclusion that a transaction, including attempted transaction, whether or not made in cash, or a series of transaction integrally connected are of suspicious nature," RBI said. The RBI notification reiterates the government's amendment to the Prevention of Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2009 (21 of 2009), which has come into force with effect from June 1st.

The RBI said it is the institution's responsibility to ensure that its branches and franchises conform to these norms. Non-compliance will attract penal provisions of the acts concerned, RBI said.

Section 195 / 201 liability cannot be avoided on ground of non-taxability of recipient

Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:38 PM By Livemail


CIT vs. Samsung Electronics (Karnataka High Court)


The assessee made payments to a foreign company for purchase of 'shrink- wrapped' / ready-made software without deduction of tax at source u/s 195 (1). The AO held that the payments were chargeable to tax in the hands of the foreign company as "royalty" u/s 9 (1) (vi) and that the assessee was liable u/s 201 for non-deduction of tax and interest thereon. On appeal, this view was confirmed by the CIT (A) though the Tribunal (94 ITD 91) held that the TDS Case Lawpayments for software, being a purchase of a 'copyrighted article' and 'goods' as held by in Tata Consultancy Services 271 ITR 401 (SC), was not liable to tax in India and consequently there was no obligation on the assessee to deduct tax at source u/s 195 (1). On appeal by the Revenue, HELD reversing the Tribunal:

(i) The effect of the judgement of the Supreme Court in Transmission Corporation of India 239 ITR 587 is that the moment there is a payment to a non-resident, there is an obligation on the payer to deduct tax at source u/s 195 (1). The only way to escape the liability is for the payer to make an application to the AO u/s 195 (2) for non-deduction or for deduction at a lower rate. If the payer does not make an application and obtain an order u/s 195 (2), it is not open to him to argue that the payment has not resulted in taxable income in the hands of the non-resident recipient and that, therefore, there is no failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax u/s 195 (1);

(ii) In an appeal by the payer against an order u/s 201 imposing liability on the payer for failure to deduct tax u/s 195 (1), there is absolutely no scope for the appellate authority to adjudicate whether the non-resident recipient was chargeable to tax or not and the rate at which it was so chargeable. If the appellate authority in the payer's case determines the tax liability of the recipient, there may arise conflicts if in the assessment of the recipient a different view is taken as to its taxable status;

(iii) The Tribunal committed an error in determining in the appeals filed by the payer that the payment to the non-resident was not liable to tax and thereby holding the payer was not liable u/s 201 for non-deduction u/s 195 (1).

Government may drop tax on religious trusts from code

10:03 AM By Livemail



The finance ministry is likely to drop the proposal to tax religious trusts. The proposal formed part of the direct taxes code and had raised eyebrows both within and outside the finance ministry.

                       The issue has been raised in the finance ministry's internal discussions. They are discussing whether the exemption was removed with intent or by mistake. Under Section 10 (23C) of the Income Tax Act, any trust or institution that works wholly for public religious and charitable purposes and is approved by the chief commissioner or director general, is tax exempt. The tax code, however, has removed the term "religious purpose" from the exemption eligibility and instead said income of only those bodies that are registered under any Act of the Centre or the state and administer religious trusts, endowments or societies will be exempt. Taxation experts have also opposed the proposal. In the existing system, all religious monuments registered with the commissioner of income tax get exemption, provided they are able to spend 85 per cent of the funds for religious purposes. In the direct taxes code, only government institutions such as the Wakf Board controlling religious trust are exempt.

 

In the same way, the income of authorities managing religious shrines such as Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Vaishno Devi would be fully exempt from tax under the direct taxes code since they are established under a government Act. Currently, institutions can be registered with the tax department to claim deduction. Under the new code, they can register only with the Centre or the state government to claim deduction. But this could be a problem since only three states have provision for registration — Maharashtra, Gujarat and Orissa. Moreover, Section 80G of the existing Income Tax Act gives 50 per cent exemption on donations made to religious trusts. The new code has proposed such exemption only for renovation or repair of a temple, mosque, gurdwara, church or other place that has been notified in the official gazette to be of historic, archaeological or artistic importance or a place of public worship of renown throughout any state or states.

 

Experts said this proposal in the code would significantly reduce donations since any contribution meant for spending on religious activities of a shrine such as bhajans and kirtans, or charitable activity, like feeding or teaching the poor, would be fully taxed. Religious places that will be eligible for tax exemptions on donations will be notified later. Any religious monument may not qualify to be of artistic or historic importance. This will impact donations in a country where religion takes precedence over lots of issues. Experts agreed, "Religious trusts are not taxed in most countries because they receive donations from the people. The authorities must have forgotten to put them in the exemption list.

 - K.Balaji

New TDS Rates in simple format

Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:51 AM By Livemail



New TDS rates applicable from 1st October, 2010

 

Section                        :           192

Head                             :           Income from Salaries

Threshold Limit              :           -nil-

For individual /HUF         :           average rate

Other Entity                   :           not applicable

 

Section                        :           194A

Head                             :           Interest from a banking company

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 10,000/-

For individual /HUF         :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           20 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194A

Head                             :           Interest other than a banking company

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 5,000/-

For individual /HUF         :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           20 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194C

Head                             :           Payments to Contractors

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 20,000/- per contract or Rs. 50,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           1 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           2 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194C

Head                             :           Payments to Contractors / Sub-contractor in transport business

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 20,000/- per contract or Rs. 50,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           nil (if PAN quoted), 1 % (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           nil if PAN quoted), 2 % (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194C

Head                             :           Payments to Sub-contractors / Advertising contractors

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 20,000/- per contract or Rs. 50,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           1 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           2 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194I

Head                             :           Rent on Plant & Machinery

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 1, 20,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           2 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           2 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194I

Head                             :           Rent other than Plant & Machinery

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 1, 20,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

 

Section                        :           194IJ

Head                             :           Fees for Professional / technical services

Threshold Limit              :           Rs. 20,000/- p.a.

For individual /HUF         :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

Other Entity                   :           10 % (if PAN quoted), Sec 206AA will apply (if PAN not quoted)

***

Section 206 AA:           If deductee fails to furnish PAN to deductor, the deductor shall apply highest of the following rates for deducting TDS:-

-          at the rate specified in the relevant provision of this Act; or

-          at the rate or rates in force; or

-          at the rate of 20%.

Report on the Quality of Data and Matching of TDS / TCS Claims in your E-Return -

Tuesday, November 17, 2009 5:56 PM By Livemail

Dear Taxpayer,


Subject: Report on the Quality of Data and Matching of TDS / TCS Claims in your E-Return - Reg

1.       Income Tax Department congratulates you for filing your Income Tax return electronically. As a pro-active measure, a Data Quality and Matching Report for TDS and TCS claims in I-T Return is being sent as an attachment to this email.

2.       The objective of issuing the Data Quality and Matching Report for TDS and TCS claims in I-T Return is:

a.       To enable you to ascertain the extent of matching of your TDS / TCS claims in the Income Tax Return filed by you with the TDS / TCS reported by the tax Deductors /Collectors. In case the matching is 100%, you may be assured of accurate credit and quicker processing of the I-T Return.

b.       To enable you to take up the matter pertaining to any deficiencies or mismatches in the TDS / TCS reported with your Deductor / Collector so that the corrective action can be taken by them by filing an updated E-TDS return with NSDL with your correct PAN or TDS amount.

c.        To enable you to identify claims made by you using invalid TAN. In all cases where TAN is invalid the "Name of the Deductor" is mentioned as "INVALID TAN" and in all such cases no match is possible. The TAN in these cases would have to rectified by you by filing a revised Return of Income with correct TAN.

3.       The TDS / TCS credit information available are based on the valid PAN details submitted by the Deductors up to the date mentioned in the Data Quality and Matching Report for TDS and TCS claims in I-T Return. Please note that all TDS /TCS from the same Deductor / Collector is added and consolidated as a single entry, both on the claims side as well as on the data reported to Department side.

4.       To open the statement, please enter the PAN and date of birth in case of individualtax payers and the date of incorporation for non-individual tax payers as password in theformat of AAAAA1234ADDMMYYYY in lowercase. The date of birth / incorporation should be same as furnished to the Department and available in the Income Tax Department PAN master (as printed on the PAN card).

For example, if your PAN is AZZPZ2398K and date of birth / incorporation is January 21, 1985 then the password will be azzpz2398k21011985

5.       The Data Quality and Matching Report is in the attached ZIP file with your PAN as the file name. To open the file all you need is any Unzip software and MS Excel or Open Office Excel compatible software.

6.       Please note that this email does not convey any confirmation of acceptance or rejection of any TDS or TCS claim and neither does this indicate that processing has been completed or will be completed in any manner.The Report merely conveys a factual position of the extent of match between your claims and data reported to the Department as on the date specified.The details given herein may be altered upon receipt of updated E-TDS / TCS returns filed by Deductors / Collectors subsequent to the specified date.

7.       This is a special service for the benefit of taxpayers who have chosen to file their I-T returns electronically and is being sent to you at the email address mentioned by you in the Income Tax Return.


States want GST to Replace Cesses and Surcharges at Both the Central and State Levels

Sunday, November 15, 2009 8:35 PM By Livemail

With barely over four months left for the rollout of goods and services tax (GST), states, on Tuesday, proposed that the new tax regime should subsume most central indirect levies like excise and service tax as well as state taxes like VAT, making it easier for business and industry.
GST (5) 

                        The states released a discussion paper prepared by the Empowered Committee of their finance ministers here which said the GST should also replace cesses and surcharges at both the central and state levels. The much-talked about discussion paper did not give any idea about rates and the items to be included in it. However, it made some specific suggestions such as alcohol and petroleum tax should be out of GST, while tobacco be included in it.
The committee would take a final view on whether natural gas would be included in the GST after further deliberations, it said. The discussion paper suggests that among central taxes, additional excise duty, additional customs duty, and special additional duty be replaced by the GST. State taxes like entertainment tax, except for the one levied by local bodies, luxury tax, taxes on lottery, entry tax except octroi are proposed to be out once the new tax regime is introduced. It proposed that exports from SEZs would not attract GST, but sales from SEZ to domestic markets will draw the tax. The paper said industrial incentives given in the form of tax exemptions would be converted into cash refund schemes.

Purchase Tax Issue

It also said the issue of replacing purchase tax with GST is being discussed with the Centre. After GST is introduced, Central Sales Tax, imposed on inter-state movement of goods is slated to be removed. For this purpose, it said the Centre would impose a tax, IGST, a total of state and central GSTs.
Empowered Committee Chairman Asim Dasgupta said services would, however, have only one rate. The Centre is yet to take a call on its GST rates. Before, it is implemented four bills relating to constitutional amendment, state GST, Centre GST and IGST, would have to be passed. He said draft constitutional amendment bill will be out by November 15, and other bills will be ready by month-end. Commenting on the discussion paper Bangalore Chamber of Industry and Commerce President K R Girish said “A plain reading the discussions paper indicates that it will impact Trade and Industry in the area of supply chain, finance, IT systems and process marketing, etc. At least as far as Karnataka is concerned it appears that Entry tax will continue. It would be worthwhile, if the Centre and the States still consider stamp duty and electricity taxes to be subsumed into the GST net. While intentions seem to be honorable, there is a clear need for a determined action plan with identified responsibilities to see the implementation.”

ICAI has issued a lists of Companies for IFRS convergence

8:33 PM By Livemail

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has brought out a list of over 400 companies that should converge their accounting practices with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by April 2011.

IFRSb1 

                                        IFRS — issued by International Accounting Standards Board — is acknowledged by 113 countries. This is ICAI’s first list and more companies would be added on its next list, sources said. The first list comprises 439 companies. It includes BSE-Sensex companies, NSE-Nifty companies, companies that have raised debt of over $50 million abroad, financial sector companies, publicly accountable companies (with total borrowings of over Rs 1,000 crore), Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies that have implemented IFRS at the parent company and companies outside these categories with capital of over $50 million abroad.
Significantly, ICAI is mulling including venture capital funds also in the IFRS convergence process. The first list includes BSE and NSE companies (totalling 52), 44 insurance companies, 46 mutual fund companies, 37 Indian banks with presence only in India, 30 foreign banks with a presence in India, eight Indian banks with overseas branches, one Indian bank with subsidiaries or joint ventures abroad (Central bank of India) and four Indian banks with representative offices abroad. Then there are 217 companies including Air India Charters, Indian Railway Finance Corporation, Reliance Ports & Terminals, Jet Lite, Educomp Solutions, Exim Bank, TVS Motor, GMR Energy, GVK Power & Infrastructure, Godrej Industries, NHPC, RNRL, Videocon and Wockhardt. IFRS convergence will entail a change in the accounting process. Mr Rahul Roy, Director, Ernst & Young, said, “Depending on a company’s complexity, it will need a change in its IT and ERP systems, besides management information system. Besides, companies will have to employ valuers for various valuations.” IFRS compliance is a huge opportunity for consultants, IT companies and tax experts.
The cost of compliance will range from Rs 10-12 crore for a big company to Rs 8-10 lakh for a small company. But finance professionals who have not updated their IFRS skills will become obsolete while IFRS experts will command a premium salary, Mr Roy said. Companies will have to train their accounts and finance personnel on IFRS. After IFRS convergence, benchmarking Indian companies with their global peers will be more accurate. ICAI will hold talks on IFRS convergence with SEBI, IRDA, RBI and the Corporate Affairs Ministry on the changes in SEBI guidelines, IRDA rules and regulations, the Banking Regulation Act, Companies Act and National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards notifications.

ICAI will convene talks with companies in oil and gas, aviation, pharma and textiles to evaluate the sectoral impact. It will follow the IASB’s programmes on converging IFRS with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ICAI could also evolve separate and simpler IFRS norms for small and medium enterprises as such companies lack the resources to converge with IFRS.

CBEC Launched E-Payment

Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:12 PM By Livemail

        CBEC launched electronic payment system for accounts offices of excise and 
        service tax :


Indirect tax body CBEC launched electronic payment system for accounts offices of excise and service tax. It also introduced a new software to make the accounting system within the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) fully automated. Revenue Secretary P V Bhide inaugurated the e-pay system, software and a website for Chief Controller of Accounts, CBEC.


After automation, information for accounting headwise, reports on collection of duty and other items will be easily available. The government wants to replicate the same system on the customs side as well, the Controller General of Accounts, CBEC, C R Sundaramurti, said. The system assumes importance at a time when the Goods and Services Tax is expected to be rolled out. "Our initial brainstorming indicates that the accounting system may have to follow the existing broad framework being inaugurated today with such changes as may become necessary on the basis of the decisions of the Empowered Committee(on GST)," Sundaramurti said.

FBT Shadow hangs over your salary slip

Sunday, November 8, 2009 10:37 AM By Livemail


Employees enjoying perks such as chauffeur-driven cars, rent-free accommodation, club memberships, credit cards and meal vouchers could find the next four months a little too harsh on their wallets as they may have to cough up the entire annual tax on such benefits during this period.

The government is set to announce the norms for taxation of fringe benefits that have become taxable in the hands of employees after a change effected in the 2009-10 Budget, a finance ministry official told ET. The norms will detail how the perks will be taxed and what benefits will come under the tax net. In the absence of guidelines, most companies are yet to start deducting tax on fringe benefits. Therefore, the tax burden for the entire financial year from April 1, 2009 will be distributed over the remaining four months, that too, if apex tax agency Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) allows companies to do so. This would mean lower net salaries in the remaining months of the current financial year for employees enjoying such benefits. If the apex direct tax body fails to make such a provision, employers will have to deduct the amount in the month the rules become effective. The July 2009 Budget dropped FBT and returned the earlier system of taxing perks in the hands of the employee. Now, the value of the perk specified by CBDT will be added to an employee's income and taxed accordingly. For example, as per the earlier perquisite taxation rules that were in effect before FBT was introduced, the value assigned to an 800-cc car was Rs 1,200.

This value of Rs 1,200 was added to a taxpayer's total income in the year and taxed accordingly. Since perks are fully consumed and have no savings element, any tax burden on them will have to come out of disposable income. Any major departure from the pre-FBT rules would create an enormous burden for the salaried class. Employees of those companies that had already started deducting tax on these benefits as per the old rules, which were in effect before the controversial FBT was introduced in 2005, would not be hit so hard as they would have paid some tax. However, as the overall liability is likely to be more due to the government's plan of bringing more benefits under the tax net, they too will have to shell out additional amounts.

Many companies have been deferring the decision on taxation of the perquisites. Now, as the financial year-end is approaching, companies are proposing to use the existing rules that were applicable prior to the withdrawal of FBT and finalise tax computations.

In the perks taxation regime before FBT, perquisites that were taxed included rent-free accommodation, car, chauffeur, services of personal attendants, concessional education, concessional journeys, credit card, interest-free loans, gift vouchers, hotel stay exceeding 15 days and medical facilities. The value of these services was the actual cost to the employer.

Cap on salaries of CEOs of companies has been removed in the new Bill

Saturday, November 7, 2009 12:55 AM By Livemail

The existing 11% cap on salaries of chief executives officers (CEOs) of companies has been removed in the new Companies Bill, 2009, corporate affairs minister Salman Khursheed said on Thursday.


He said that the government has made this modification on its own. Salaries of the CEOs should be decided by shareholders, he added Khursheed, who inaugurated the 37th national convention of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India, said the new Bill, which was tabled in the Lok Sabha in August, was being examined by a parliamentary standing committee. He, however, hinted that executives should think as responsible citizens before deciding on huge salaries.

Khursheed also said that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) will continue its probe into alleged corporate law violations by Satyam founder B. Ramalinga Raju, but other agencies would probe alleged violations in foreign exchange rules. He added that foreign exchange violations would be probed by the Enforcement Directorate, revenue manipulations would be looked into by the income-tax department and other cases would be investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation. The ministry had devised a system where the government would be able to detect corporate frauds at an early stage, he said. There will be 15 warning parameters that would be applied to firms that are under scanner, he said-Officials will periodically check on revenues, profits and other issues such as employees strength. The system will sound an alert if there is any abnormality in the records, he said.


Government discussing suggestions of stakeholders to modify Direct Tax Code: FM

12:54 AM By Livemail


PIB Press Release No BSC/KP/366/09, dated 5-11-2009

Government would make all efforts to meet the aspirations and expectations of the taxpayers and the corporate sector before finalisation of the Direct Tax Code.  The next steps in this  direction  would  be taken only after a comprehensive review of the draft Direct Tax Code by taking on board the suggestions received.  This was stated by the Finance Minister, Shri  Pranab Mukherjee while addressing the first newly constituted Parliamentary Consultative Committee attached  to his ministry  here yesterday.  He said we are trying to bring the new taxation regime, which can last for another 50 years.  Therefore, our endeavor is to see that new taxation system should include the basic features and time tested procedures of existing act, which have survived judicial security over the years, he added.

Shri Mukherjee said that he has started discussions within the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the suggestions received so far.  The outcome of the discussion would be used for modifying the proposals contained in the draft Direct Tax Code.

The Finance Minister said while the initial reaction has been very encouraging, more detailed examination and interaction with stakeholders is throwing up some areas of concern.  On the basis of interactions with the stakeholders, Government  has identified nine critical areas for further detailed examination.  These relate to  (i) The concept of Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) based on gross assets;  (ii) Capital Gains Taxation in the case of non-residents; (iii) The Income Tax Act and the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA); (iv) General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR); (v) Issues relating to effective management control and taxation of foreign companies in India; (vi) Taxation of charitable organizations;  (vii) Shift from EEE to EET taxation system;  (viii)Taxation of income from house property in case of Self-Occupied Property (SOP) by the individual; and (ix) Taxation in case of salaried class employees.

Shri. Mukherjee informed the meeting that the draft Tax Code has following new features:

(i)         The rate of slabs for personal income tax in the case of individuals are as under:

 Rs. 1.6 lakh to Rs. 10 lakh                    10%

Rs. 10 lakh to Rs. 25 lakh                     20%

More than Rs. 25 lakh  30%

This proposed slab rates for personal Income Tax would put more money in the hands of consumers;

 (ii)        The rate for Corporate tax for companies is 25%;

 (iii)       Proposal for advance pricing agreement in respect of arm's length in relation to an international transaction.  The Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) will provide certainty in cross border transactions with taxpayer and it will facilitate in investments in India.  Industry has been demanding for introduction of APA in India for quite some time.  This proposal is in line with the best global practices adopted by many countries across the globe.

 (iv)         Rationalization of deductions and exemptions for streamlining the administrative processes and also to reduce the rent seeking behavior and

 (v)        Proposal for General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) to check the treaty misuse by the third party residents.

Shri. Mukherjee said that it has been our endeavour to incorporate the best practices prevailing across the globe and to use innovative methods for attaining equity—vertical and horizontal, ensure growth with sustainability, create stable fiscal eco-system and have well regulated free markets in the Draft Tax Code. We want to present the stakeholders with a tax regime which is simple and broad based leading to lowering of tax rates, better tax compliance, reduced litigation certainty and stability in taxation system, added the Finance Minister.

The meeting was attended by S/Shri Shantaram Naik, Rahul Bajaj, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Sabir Ali, Mukut Mithi, Rajeev Shukla, N.K. Singh, and Tariq Anwar - members of  Rajya Sabha  and  S/Shri Narahari Mahato,  Partap Singh bajwa,  Bhausaheb Rajaram,  Vijay Inder Singla, Mukesh B. Gadhvi, Arvind Kumar Chaudhary  Natubhai Gomanbhai Patel,  Suresh C. Angadi,  Prabhat Singh Chauhan, T.R. Ballu, and  Smt. Rajkumari Ratna Singh - member of Lok Sabha.  Minister of State for Finance Shri  S.S. Palanimanickam, Revenue Secretary, Expenditure Secretary, Disinvestment secretary and  other senior officers the ministry attended the meeting..

CIT vs. Dr. P. S. Pasricha (Bombay High Court)

Friday, November 6, 2009 5:59 PM By Livemail

S. 54 relief allowable even if new house purchased from borrowed funds

 

S. 54 provides that if an assessee has LTCG on transfer of a residential house and he purchases or constructs a residential house within the specified period then the amount appropriated towards the new house shall be deducted from the LTCG. The assessee sold a house and used the sale proceeds to buy commercial property. Subsequently (but within the specified period) he borrowed funds and purchased a new house. The AO denied deduction u/s 54 on the ground that the new house had been purchased out of borrowed funds and not out of the consideration received for the old house. On appeal, the Tribunal and High Court upheld the claim on the ground that s. 54 merely required the purchase of the new house to be within the specified period. The source of funds for the purchase was irrelevant.


ITAT Special Bench judgement on indexed cost

5:46 PM By Livemail

DCIT vs. Manjula Shah (ITAT Mumbai Special Bench)


Indexed cost of gifted assets has to be determined with reference to previous owner

 

The assessee transferred a capital asset which was received by her by way of gift on 1.2.2003. The previous owner had acquired the capital asset on 29.1.1993. In computing capital gains, the assessee claimed that the indexed cost of acquisition had to be worked out by taking the date of acquisition by the previous owner. The AO rejected the claim though the CIT (A) accepted it. On appeal by the Revenue, the issue was referred to the Special Bench. HELD by the Special Bench:

 

(i) Explanation (iii) to s. 48 defines the term "indexed cost of acquisition" to mean the amount which bears to the cost of acquisition the same proportion as the …. Cost Inflation Index for the first year in which the asset was held by the assessee …" A literal reading of the provision suggests that one has to go by the year in which the asset was held by the assessee. However, this would be inconsistent with the scheme of the Act as reflected in the definition of "short-term capital asset" in Expl. 1(b) to s. 2 (42A) which provides that the period for which the asset was held by the previous owner also has to be taken into account. It is not logical that the cost of acquisition and the period of holding is determined with reference to the previous owner and the indexation factor is determined with reference to the date of acquisition by the assessee. Such an interpretation will lead to absurdity and unjust results and defeat the purpose of the concept of 'indexed cost of acquisition'. In accordance with the principles of purposive interpretation of statutes, Expl. (iii) to s. 48 has to be read to mean that the indexed cost of acquisition has to be computed by taking into account the period for which the asset was held by the previous owner.

 

Kishore Kanugo 102 ITD 437 (Mum) is reversed while Meena Devgan 117 TTJ 121 (Kol) and Pushpa Sofat 81 ITD 1 (Chd) (SMC) are approved.

{Ca+Cma+Cs Friends} RE: Donation by Charitable trust out of India

Monday, November 2, 2009 9:07 PM By Livemail

 

Dear Friends,
 
Further to below mentioned quarry, as per proviso to section 11(1)(c) of IT act, 1961, "provided that the Board by general or special order, has directed in either case that it shall not be included in the total income of the person in receipt of such income"
 
Members are requested to kindly share the special or general order issued by CBDT in respect of proviso to section 11(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 or the list of countries to whom donation can be made by a charitable or religious trust and same shall be treated as application of the income of the trust for the objects of the that trust.
 

With best regards,

CA  brajesh agarwal

09818623388 (m)

 



From: Brajesh Agarwal
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:05 PM

Dear Friends,

 

Under section 11 of the Income tax act, if a charitable trust make a donation to another charitable in India trust then the amount of donation is treated as application of funds.

 

However if a charitable trust in India donates to another charitable trust outside India, then whether such donation shall also be treated as application of funds or not.

 

Members are requested to share their views on the above together with decided case law, notification of circular which support their views.

 

With best regards,

CA  brajesh agarwal

09818623388 (m)

 

 

 

__._,_.___
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               Please ask your friends to send a blank e-mail to:
                     CaCmaCsFriends-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
                              to join the group.
................................................................................
       <Ca+Cma+Cs Friends> needs active, energetic persons as co-moderators
................................................................................
- For more information: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CaCmaCsFriends
- To Post message     :  CaCmaCsFriends@yahoogroups.com
- For Digest option   :  CaCmaCsFriends-digest@yahoogroups.com
- To switch to Normal :  CaCmaCsFriends-normal@yahoogroups.com
- For No Mail         :  CaCmaCsFriends-nomail@yahoogroups.com
- For Basic Help      :  CaCmaCsFriends-help@yahoogroups.com
- To Subscribe        :  CaCmaCsFriends-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
- To Unsubscribe      :  CaCmaCsFriends-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Knowledge is free and for sharing. Share and increase your knowledge.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.

__,_._,___