The Reader

On 7 June 2010 21:19, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:

>
> If you are getting by with 16 GB now, it seems unlikely that you NEED 64
> GB....
>
> Given the choice, in very limited space, do you want the extra 32 GB of
> storage, or a larger battery?
>

1. Unless 64 GB devices like the iPod touch use 2 flash chips, why would an
extra 32 GB need more space?

2. The iPhone was already thin enough. Why not have more battery capacity
instead of reducing the volume?

Otto
PS I am surprised that there's no 64 GB version regardless.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

• New Members 82