The Reader

I've said the same about the latest SIMs. Aren't they already tiny enough?
They have to be made and mailed as part of a larger card. If they get much
smaller we'll all need microscopes to see them and install them. Any why
aren't they built-in anyway as flash memory that can be updated via USB or
wifi as required?

Some aspects of the mobile phone industry just don't make a lot of sense.

Otto

On 1 June 2010 17:05, Kris Murray <kriswmurray1@me.com> wrote:

> i like that thinking. people's fingers don't magically get smaller. some of
> us have larger than normal fingers. man they work 10 of 10 on an ipad but 7
> of ten on an iphone and anything smaller, ugh. that and instead of 16% more
> batter maybe it could have been a real wowzer and 35% bigger!
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

• New Members 65

i like that thinking. people's fingers don't magically get smaller. some of us have larger than normal fingers. man they work 10 of 10 on an ipad but 7 of ten on an iphone and anything smaller, ugh. that and instead of 16% more batter maybe it could have been a real wowzer and 35% bigger!
~KM

On Jun 1, 2010, at 6:26 AM, Otto Nikolaus wrote:

> Why not keep the same shell and
> include a bigger battery still?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

• New Members 65

I really like NoteMaster. It syncs with Google Docs, allows you to set up categories, attach pictures, email your notes. It's $3.99, but there is a lite version

Sonya

--- In apple-iphone@yahoogroups.com, "agunat" <bobnewman@...> wrote:
>
> I am looking for a program to replace the Notes application that came with the iPhone. Nothing fancy, I do not need any additional features. I would just like something a little easier to read. I would like to have a more conventional font and be able to change it's size. THE CATCH IS: it must be able to sync with notes within MS-Outlook. If it can't do that it is a deal breaker.
>
> Thanks in advance... Bob
>

• New Members 64

The difference in HxW is small but the difference in D (depth) is a lot (24%
less). The iPhone is already small enough. Why not keep the same shell and
include a bigger battery still?

On 1 June 2010 13:15, Piper <pcdoc_99@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> I looked it up, actually smaller but heavier:
>
> "The iPhone 3GS dimensions stand at 115.5 x 62.1 x 12.3 mm is slightly
> bigger compared to 4G's 114.3 x 58.7 x 9.4 mm. However, the 4G is 5 grams
> heavier compared to the 3GS. The smaller size is attributed to smaller
> components, while the 4G's weight is due to the 16% larger battery.
> Aesthetically, the 4G is much more squarish and sports a flat back, compared
> to the 3G. "
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

• New Members 64